More than a Show

Vincent Avatar

hpgrp-gallery-more-than-a-woman

I am fortunate to have really talented friends. Becky and I have been friends since college. I consider myself lucky to have been able to witness the development of her photography commercially and artistically from before her Tokyo days or as she once put it: “In college, when we used to just hang a bed sheet and pose.”

Becky Yee’s first solo show in the US, More Than a Woman at the hpgrp gallery closed over the weekend. If you were not able to make it to the show, there is a limited edition companion book available through the gallery. Its hard glossy flesh colored cover that works well as an extension of the show and subject matter.

Using Cindy Sherman’s theatrics and Diane Arbus’ flair for the fringe as my markers, Becky deftly applies their visual signatures to the photos that form the content of More Than a Woman. As Robert Shuster of the Village Voice describes it:

Somewhere between photojournalism and a fashion shoot, Yee’s softly lit images play up the erotic fantasy, but also hint at misogyny. The unmarried engineer—so dedicated to his rubber harem that he wears a wedding ring—assumes various poses with his vixens, sexual and pathetically tender… all this might have been exploitative kitsch, but Yee’s smart eye turns it into an artful creep show.

Cameron Shaw of Art Forum writes:

Each successive image elucidates the complex interaction of man and surrogate…  An unexpected tenderness emerges; the juxtaposition of real and synthetic flesh proposes that intimacy is a condition of the free mind, predicated on trust and dependability. The bête noire on display is not sexual perversion, but fear. To negate the possibility of rejection, Yee’s subject is willing to sacrifice arguably the most crucial aspect of his humanity—social improvisation.

I prefer Shaw’s description because it substitutes leading words like erotic, misogyny, dedicated, vixens, and pathetically with more probing words like interaction and juxtaposition.

As quoted in the back of her book, Becky’s intention was not to :

assert my personal judgement of any kind, but rather to frame questions. These shocking and intriguing images evoke complex emotions in me. I never thought a moment so pure, full of intimacy and tenderness could be so disturbing.

The show as an isolated event is creditworthy. The photographs are well framed and well crafted to create a relationship between subject and viewer that extends beyond the superficial curiosity of the fetish of Dutch Wives. As Shuster notes: “all this might have been exploitative kitsch, but Yee’s smart eye turns it into an artful creep show.” (though I don’t know that I would’ve called it a “creep show.”)

The show as a part of a larger social scope invites some deeper questions into our social psyche and our fascination with dolls. Regardless of whether it was planned or whether it was just incidental, the show’s occurrence during the celebration of Barbie’s 50th birthday adds a new layer of meaning to More Than a Woman.

But before that questions like:

He wears a wedding ring and states he is married when asked. Do his wives wear rings also? The social understanding of weddings is of a union where the ring symbolizes the bond.

The assumption is that he “customizes” his wives to suit his mood or his immediate needs. How many different combinations of heads, limbs, and bodies has he created so far? Can we assume that certain dolls are used for certain moods? What occurs if he is in a combative or bad mood?

Are his wives “alive” in that they have names and personalities? If he claims to have the largest collection of Dutch wives, does he consider himself a “collector”? A collector catalogues. How does he “catalogue” his wives?

Finally, does he take pictures of himself and his wives or his wives alone? Everyone has taken a “family” snapshot or has posed for one. What does his family snapshot look like? (by “family” I am referring to the one created when he married his wives.)

I feel more disturbing than the world that Becky has portrayed for us, are the resulting questions that beg contemplation. In his isolation as the only human flesh and blood participant in the relationship Becky depicts, this nameless, faceless engineer (as a product of society) himself depicts an interesting allegorical story of us (as the mainstream population at large).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: