Feb 2 2012

Daytripper: Recommended Reading for Dads

Vincent

If I were to put together a “Recommended Reading” list for dads, Fàbio Moon and Gabriel Bà’s Daytripper would definitely be on it.

It’s tough for me to talk about it without spoiling it for those who haven’t read it yet. I suck at being coy with the details – especially when it comes to a story like Daytripper — where I’ve been so eager to tell to anyone who’ll listen about it.

So let me warn you now: POSSIBLE SPOILERS.

If you are the type that gets put off when an ending is prematurely revealed, STOP HERE. I’m more of a “process guy”. I’m more interested in how the story got to where ever it ends up than the ending itself (though in this case, it is the ending that makes sense of everything on the “trip”).

Daytripper is a surreal journey that might immediately be mistaken as one man’s life flashing before his eyes but after the second chapter it might be that the man is being shown his “alternate lives” so he can pass in peace. Providing an itinerary for the “trip”, each chapter is named after the man’s age as it relates to that part of the story.

The story begins with the grown (32 year old) son of a famous father waiting across the street from the auditorium where his father is to receive an award. He is in an empty bar killing some time before the start of the event. He starts out just wanting a pack of cigarettes, but the bar is empty and the bartender seems friendly (Conducive for “just one drink”).

The bar is named “Genaro”, so it is natural for, Bràs, the son of the famous father to ask the bartender: “So, are you Genaro?” The bartender responds: “That’s what most people think. But, Genaro, was my father’s name… He named it after himself. I just inherited the place.”

“You could have changed the name of the bar,” Bràs says.

The bartender, Genarinho, responds, “It would still be his bar and I would still be his son.”

Bràs: “We’re all somebody’s son, right?”

Genarinho: “Right. We just don’t get to choose our family.”

Genarinho’s nephew enters the bar. This is where the introduction ends and story begins.

Bràs is a writer like his father. But unlike his father, no one recognizes him as a “cultural icon”. He writes obituaries, which either Jorge, Bràs’ best friend, or his girlfriend (I can’t remember) tell him is as equally important because of the sense of closure they offer to the surviving families of the deceased.

I wouldn’t say Bràs is jealous of his father (at least not in the poisonous way that drives soap opera plots). I would say Bràs wants to be a peer to his father. In the events leading up to the start of the story, you are told that Bràs’ father has forgotten his birthday and has forgotten to invite him to the ceremony being held in his honor. It is his mother, who urges him to go and it is Bràs who leads you to believe father has done this before and that Bràs does not interpret it as a personal slight but as a slightly painful part of his father’s personality. So of course he is going to the gala honoring his father, direct invite or not.

Among the many themes possible in Daytripper is the one of “action”. Bràs struggles with his inertness. The example that comes to mind is how, when you were a young child, you were told to stay where you were, if you were ever separated from your parent and lost.

Bràs is lost. He is not unhappy about his job as a obituary writer but he is uninspired by it. He wants more. Bràs is lost and doing what that lost child was told to do – staying right where he was when he realized he was lost and waiting for a parent to find him and set him back on his way.

His friends – Lemanja (goddess of the sea and protector of children)  – even his parents – all tell him to take action – to decide – and be on his way. But he has many reasons – both real and invented — for hesitating. In the context of the story, you are never told whether the events that happen to him after the bar are real or imagined.

Another possible theme in the story directly addresses the relationship between father and son – legacy?

There is no doubt about the influence Bràs’ father has on his life, though it is not an intentional or direct influence. Bràs’ father is not depicted as being overbearing or domineering. It is more a condition of how Bràs empowers the image of his father in his life. I say “image” because his father probably has no clue about the weight of his actions on his son.

As a father of sons, it is the ending of Daytripper that makes it a must read for fathers. I wish I was smart enough to properly convey the sense of its profundity I felt when I read it. I can say thought that it is a lost letter from his deceased father found within the pages of Bràs’ first book. And add that the way the letter was found and who found the letter is very symbolic of the relationship between fathers and sons.


Jan 26 2012

Adrian Mole Aged 30something

Vincent

Now 30 years old, The Secret Diary of Adrian Mole Aged 13 3/4 can still make you laugh as the main character, Adrian, relays the adolescent struggles of his daily life. In addition to the book retaining its relevance more than a score since its first publication, Adrian Mole also functions as a time capsule, providing clues to the impact of the big events of the early 80s like Charles and Diana’s wedding and England’s involvement in the Falkland War.

In a BBC Radio 4 interview, the interviewer, Evan Davis, and, the author, Sue Townsend, ponder if history is repeating itself –

Davis: “You probably didn’t watch Prime Minister’s Questions but the theme was how everything’s returned to the 1980s – We’re going on about the Falkland Islands, unemployment rising, a Tory government, you know.”

Townsend: (laughing) Nothing changes.

Val Hennessey writing in the Mail Online would disagree:

Yet things have changed. Already, Townsend’s masterpiece evokes a vanished, more innocent time before mobile phones, Facebook, internet porn, teenage binge-drinking, fast-food takeaways and substance abuse. Adrian’s world is one of phone boxes, gramophones, GP home visits, youth clubs, ping-pong matches, neighbourliness and respect for the law.

And I would disagree with Val Hennessey (and also with Sue).

Val is right in that things do change. However, I disagree that the 80s were a more innocent time. There was porn, teenage binge-drinking, fast-food takeaways and substance abuse before mobile phones, Facebook, and the internet. The latter three just made it possible to bring the former three into brighter lights and broader audiences.

Sue is right in believing that despite the technology people at their core don’t really change. Adrian Mole has withstood the test of time because the adolescent issues he contends with are a constant amid the technological advances. Acne, first loves, first heartbreaks, personal identity, and the fallibility of your elders, these are all things children address as they progress from age 12 to age 13 3/4. I agree with Sue, if this is what she means by “Nothing changes.”

However, Sue is wrong, if social tolerances are included in the discussion. I think we have advanced and changed as a society too. While not as fast as our technological advances, as a people we have crossed some important thresholds in terms of equality and tolerance.

Adrian Mole was published at the start of the 80s, before the AIDS epidemic and Band AID (and LIVE AID), before the rise of cable TV and MTV (my introduction to New Wave music and style), before the introduction of the Apple Macintosh and the rise of the personal PC, before movies based on Tama Janowitz and Brett Easton Ellis novels, before Pretty in Pink and The Breakfast Club, before Pac Man and Atari.

We Love This Book posts:

However Townsend doesn’t think Mole would have adapted well to teenage life in 2012. “He would be exactly the same but he wouldn’t be using Twitter to memorialise his life," she says. "He would keep a secret diary. Mole’s privacy is still intact. He would not use social networking."

I know he is her invention and I admit I have not read any of the other books in the Adrian Mole collection but I think she’s wrong. I think if Adrian were 13 3/4s in the 21st Century, he would be on Facebook and Twitter seeking out other intellectuals worldwide from the safety of his hometown.

Instead of a paper and pen diary, Adrian might have a password protected blog or a private YouTube channel where he records his daily observations and aspirations. The distractions offered by 20th Century comforts like video game consoles, VHS tape rentals, and cable TV would have certainly fed Adrian’s imagination and social development.

Is Evan Davis right? Is 2012 going to be a 1982 rerun? It’s too soon to tell.  I like how Like Totally 80s presents it: “80s Fashions Return With 21st Century Corrections.” Just change “fashions” to “social politics” or any other topic.

Emma Cossey begins her post at For Book’s Sake:

Every generation has a literary hero. Whilst the teens of today idolise Harry Potter and Bella Swan, the thirty-somethings had a very different idol: Adrian Mole.

I don’t know that Adrian Mole would have been an idol of mine had I read him in the 80s. I was too into Jim Carroll and Holden Caufield. But I do know that reading Adrian Mole now brought back memories of similar situations and feelings I had had when I was 13 3/4s. And I think if I pick the book up again in 2032 (Adrian Mole’s 50th birthday), I would revisit the same memories and laugh at the same descriptions.

Happy Birthday Adrian Mole!